Simple guiding principles for an #unappraisal

22 Dec

We see the toll that performance management takes. We see it couched in the language of being effective and what it means to exist in an excellent organisation, predicated on internal relations prescribed as healthy or resilient. We feel such languages and practices sucking the affective marrow out of our beings. We see organisational appraisal as a drive for organisational surplus at the expense of the community, and it reminds us of Hayek:

in the evolution of the structure of human activities, profitability works as a signal that guides selection towards what makes man more fruitful; only what is more profitable will, as a rule, nourish more people, for it sacrifices less than it adds. (F.A. Hayek, The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988), p. 46.)

Appraisal is driven by organisational strategy and rooted in the support for those activities that enable the institution to mediate its performance through competition, surplus, the market, commodity production and exchange. It is SMART but never wise. It is never about self-mediation. It is about estrangement; about being a stranger to yourself.

To that end, we have scoped some simple guiding principles for an #unappraisal. For an alternative way of doing academic work.

  1. Hold the unappraisal in a space conducive to discussing existence in-and-against academic work
  2. Use the unappraisal to help each other to make sense of and exist in their own capitalist university – unappraisers help each other look after themselves in their institutions.
  3. Live values of courage, faith, generosity, tolerance and dignity in your unappraisal
  4. The unappraisal is a contribution to solidarity, and its point of origin and return is self and shared dignity
  5. Nourish your body as well as your soul in unappraising
  6. Careful and courageous examination of the languages, presuppositions and values of the capitalist university is a starting point for unappraisal
  7. In refusing excellence, impact, objectives and indicators, you will be initiating the learning process called unappraisal
  8. By accepting, celebrating and challenging the autobiographical nature of academic work you will be entering into unappraisal
  9. The unappraisal is not framed by helplessness or lamentation; it’s negativity points towards hope through care

The @thirduniversity on the @thirduniversity

16 Dec

The Third University went down to the bank of ideas yesterday to attend the 2nd discussion about the potential for a London Free University at the Bank of Ideas. The Third University have been around for a while now, since March, and it’s seen and been to a few things in the few months it has existed that was like that discussion last night. As consensus discussion is hard to work with and it was felt that although asked, we couldn’t really tell people what we had done so far that perhaps answered and mainly asked a lot of questions about power, dominating voices and fear of listening within critical spaces, it was felt that we should reflect on the things that we have done, perhaps to help those who are trying to set something up or to avoid getting trapped by the same ideas they are supposed to be critiquing.

February 2011

Born in a pub, possibly because it was difficult to decide the value of throwing an egg at Nick Clegg in a privatised space such as a shopping mall. We were happy to be the third university in Leicester, because the other two were happy to charge 9 thousand pounds for the privilege. We were also friends with the social science centre and the really open university, who opened up the possibility about what we might become. We visited the Really Free School in London and was inspired by things just happening and people learning from each other.

March 2011 

First teach in – at the coffee republic in leicester on the day of the UCU strike. We were there for a few hours and we discussed what a third university might be and look like and who and what will it teach. We stuck loads of post it notes on the mirror and were donated some nice chocolate cake as well as being allowed to use the space. It’s amazing actually, there is space everywhere – you can just do stuff when you stop getting hung up on metrics and accreditations. Many people there were already teaching something to somebody somewhere. This was warming. This is the sort of stuff we spoke about. The third university dissolves into city and appears when we need it.

April 2011

The Third University ran a alternative teaching training session at NatterJacks Bar – who were also very nice and offered us space any time that we feel that we might need it. We set our objectives of teaching – if it is your first night, you have to teach. And teach people have. We learned about what people knew already, what they would like to learn and really, it is just nice hanging out with people who are passionate about the things they like. This has framed much of what the Third University has been about. Here is a list of the things that we discussed and the things we might learn.

May 2011

The Third University ran some lessons in liberating knowledge where we took out learning to lunchtime and dissolved into the high street. It was a nice sunny day. We took a break to hang out the bunting.

June 2011

The Third University hung out the bunting during Community Media Week. It did some stuff around social media, and citizen media and the shock doctrine. It invited people from all different parts of the UK to think about how to critique things like education and the olympics. It was nice to work with our friend citizen eye who are already providing free education opportunities to Leicester.

We took up Croquet. We held lunchtime lessons in Croquet and wet maths through June and…

July 2011

We won croquet! We beat the high chancellors of lols and took victory on the pitch. We saw the politics in croquet.

We also responded to the alternative alternative white paper. We are worried about alternatives too. So we set up a customer charter, just to make sure that those who are part of the third university know their place.

We announced our unemployability framework – the focus for 2011/2012 term, making sure that our members constantly make sure they are increasing becoming less employable by age.

We expanded, advertising for a Third University Business manager – where we appointed Professor Terry Wassall and promoted him to Professor pretty much before we got his references because it was a sure bet and he’s our pal.

We tried to learn about consensus decision making – but it changed everything. So we came back to Leicester and made no decisions.

August 2011

We did some arty stuff for a change. We taught in and out during the riots, it was more educational than watching the telly.

We went camping in Hampshire. We drank beer and chatted about everything. We weren’t very good at behaving or doing what we were told. We can put up a tent though.

September 2011

But we got ready for protest and prepared for November.

We have to acknowledge politics in everything. We bring what we learn from the third university and it helps us do the things that we need to do in other spaces. And that’s nice.

October 2011

We occupied everywhere. We visited Wall Street, St Pauls, Glasgow, Ayr, Leicester, Manchester, Birmingham, Nottingham. And we thought about it.

November 2011

Especially in our home town, Leicester. We were inspired by the young people who were raising awareness for the things that others would choose to ignore. We visited some more Occupy camps, we spoke at a few and shared stuff in tent city university, in the bank of ideas, in nottingham city centre, at the Space Project in Leeds. We loved to learn from people and feed on the energy of the movement.

December 2011

We came to London to speak with those who are inspired to set up and encourage a national network of free universities across the UK. We hoped that we could join them and share why and how we did what we have done this year. But it was about technology before doing, it was about spectacle before substance, it was about numbers before people. And that was hard for us.

In the new year, we are putting out focus into continuing to work with the communities and the people who support us, to run a day of activity about the things we like, to play darts, to talk and build with bikes and alternatives to the world we live in. We have to do it by talking to people, not building destinations. We can have space when we need it, but mostly the space we need is here already. We don’t need to recruit but you can join us if you wish. We are going to continue to watch what happens.

Radical alternatives? Surely we can do better?

16 Dec

We wish to juxtapose two things.

The first thing is this statement from Vinay Gupta on the muppetocracy. In it Vinay gave us food-for-thought about the desperate hard-work that a re-politicised form of higher education might have to undertake in the face of socio-environmental crisis. He writes

“Do you think Occupy, or any political group, Left, Right, Green, Libertarian or other, has any hope of doing so much better than our existing system that we actually manage climate?”

He goes on, damningly:

“Gandhi’s last card was this: with enough discipline, we could govern ourselves and our own affairs so that the State had little or nothing to do. Everyone perfect in their duty to their family. Everyone perfect in their duty to their neighbour. Every village perfect in its duty to its poorer neighbours: a global wave of responsibility displacing coercive models at every point.

“That’s not happening either.

“And now the question: do you know what to do?

“So here we are, face to face, at the end of our tethers. If you’re not aware of this situation, I guarantee you it’s because you’re not paying attention, alas. The more people know about these issues, the more worried they get. The best of us are chronically depressed and grasping at straws, fighting our own minor battles in full expectation of futility, while awaiting results that seem to take forever to come.”

The second thing is about futile battles. We popped along to the Bank of Ideas last evening to see how the London Free University was developing. We love the Bank of Ideas, just like we love the Space Project in Leeds, and the Social Science Centre in Lincoln, and the heroes in Oakland and those who are indignant in Chile and Spain and Greece, and everywhere. There were some lovely people at the first meeting of the LFU – in particular it seemed to us a number of younger academics in precarious employment situations or who had been inspired by the Occupy process, and for whom education was a way in, or a way out, to something else. Something more enclosed. There were also a number of older academics for whom engagement with a different energy was revitalising.

What we learned from the second meeting was enlightening for us in thinking about place and dissent and co-option and process and curriculum, and it made us wonder a few things about *alternatives* as potentially futile battles. So this is like our Christmas list of things we have been thinking about over the course of 18 months in attending and arguing and doing, and most importantly in listening and hearing other people.

  1. There are always people who think they know the answer. Or at least how to unlock it. Like it is a commodity to be revealed. And in thinking that they know the thing they speak or skew conversations. And they demonstrate their power. And they forget to listen. And they marginalise. And they accelerate the exodus.
  2. Are we really trying to re-produce the University in the name of *free*, whatever *that* is, inside capital and ruled by money? Without a critique of the form of the University inside capitalism we risk simply re-producing all the same alienating principles that congeal and restrict inside the academy. Mimicking what we are railing against is comfortable but changes little. It simply gives us a new, safe space in which to rail and exclude.
  3. The process of consensus is disabling where it is shackled to a perceived need to be productive or by self-imposed time constraints or by the fear of being bogged down in long discussions, and by the desperate, unquestioned desire to act now. However, we’ve seen the allegedly direct democratic process of consensus used in time-limited ways to marginalise or simply give voice to those more experienced in the process. In this way it is no different to standard institutionalised forms of governance. But what is worse is the subtext that it is more open and transparent, and that somehow at every point we don’t have to out power relationships. The network, for all our trite statements about newness, is neither new nor power free. It is just as hateful and disabling, or just as counter-hegemonic and different.
  4. Nor is it good enough to use statements about alleged openness, facilitated by technological or platform richness. Or to state that everyone has access through always-on, or libraries or SMS or to use assumption and assertion of *democratic process/form* in order to drive what is a deeply political process. Technology is not neutral. Technology is enclosing and monitoring and its use needs constant attention, and we need to find a way to engage those whom it marginalises, if we are not to become that which we claim we are not. It is not enough to say that because notes from a meeting were online, and that issues were previously raised, that certain directions or issues are closed for comment. Or that we do not have the time or the courtesy to renegotiate. The very act of making such statements is an act of power-over. Previous discussions or technological determinism become veils over what was once enacted and what needs renegotiation. We need to recover and remember how our statements are potentially acts of closure, of the rejection of the need to reiterate or re-cover issues that need constant renewal. It is a sense that we must always be moving irrespective of the need to bring others along, rather than a recognition that we might not in any one place have the answer.
  5. We appear to be becoming obsessed with content. We see disenfranchised teachers wanting a place or set of spaces in which to re-find themselves. But to what purpose? To the empty promise of an education that is free for all? Free for all under capitalism with no engagement with critical pedagogy or structures or politicised forms, that risks then becoming a free-for-all. By re-engaging our focus on the subject, within its fetishised, commodified, REF-ified, controlling, capitalist appearance, we start from us. From the teacher, with the power. We do not start with the student. Or the community. This is simply another way of doing things to people. Or speaking to an echo chamber. And this is maybe where traditional university educators have it right when the mesh critical pedagogy with power, before they get to content. We know that content is safer for some people. As is producing curricula for students. But who says we know what is needed? Who says we have it right with our “activism 101” or our “educational technology 101” or our “physics 101”? For whom and for what is this free or radical education?
  6. We note that it is very rare indeed for people to start from the student or the community, and to ask how might I help that person/those people? What does this mean for me as an educator? What does this mean for power? What does this mean for process? What does this mean for politics and pedagogy? What does this mean for content? Our obsession with content and just getting on, mirrors their obsession with employability and becoming a productive economic actor.
  7. Place is important in building permacultures that emerge over time, and may congeal, as occupy threatens, into some form of counter-hegemonic position. Does it really matter that the mainstream, virtualised within its X-factor love-hate, its bitter cynicism of all things French, its snarling and visceral hatred of Leveson, its snide cynical use of austerity to demonise, might lose interest in us or our commodified, branded project? Why run to catch-up with a thing that neither knows nor cares? Do we somehow believe that the thing we loathe can be tamed? Or that we will not just form it spectacle? That the thing which brutalises can be turned through some liberal homily? Really? We might push back for a while but building the alternative as a process takes time, and deliberation, and technology, and talk, in the social centre, and the pub, and the WEA, and the Women’s Institute, and at the football, and on the picket line, and in the school and the university. And occasionally in the mainstream. But isn’t the rule and domination of the mainstream over our lives the thing we wish to break? With its alienating hatred.

I’m sure there are other things that we learned. But it has made us think about shock and awe, and how their domination of our spaces is so disconcerting at times that we can only imagine alternatives within their space and place. It is as if we can reimagine nothing other than a nicer form of what they do to us. A nicer form of control and power, because some of us are more free or more knowing than others. Rather than negating their institutional and process-driven power over us, we simply re-inscribe those patterns through our new institutions and forms and processes, whilst claiming they are new or democratic and power-free.

So we wonder how we might try to create something that starts from power and critique and critical pedagogy and politics, and most importantly from the student, in order to disengage, refuse, say no, push back or break their imposition on our world. Surely we can do better?

Occupy Leicester and Warriors for Justice

15 Nov

Today we visited Occupy Leicester. These are incredibly brave young people beginning a conversation about the world that we live in. Beginning a conversation about a world that is fore-closed. There are some fotos here, here, here and here.

Anyway, we thought we might offer some thoughts on occupation and protest. Just to keep safe and warm, you know. They are not perfect. We are all learning.

1. On keeping warm

See Vinay Gupta’s lovely advice, because it will get cold

2. On the Police’s Stop-and-Search powers

From the CAB:

Ifyou are marching on November 30, and thereafter, from GBC (trusted and on most marches):

The advice is print the second of these off and carry a few for yourself and friends. Write the phone numbers on your arm, and if you are in London on November 30 add-in solicitors ITN: 020 8522 7707

Check the GBC Legal website for more info:

3. On keeping safe

The Police’s kettling tactics are well known. Use Sukey to track what’s going on, and to contribute to the monitoring of the Police by protestors. See:

However, consider a SIM-only phone [web-enabled so you can track what’s happening assuming network availability]. The police may try to confiscate a smart-fone and take your data. Just keep basic info – legal numbers, friends on the march, home numbers etc. – either on that SIM or the fone, in case the SIM gets taken.

If you take a smart fone, consider a back-up power supply. See for instance: or

Take video/fotos of incidents. Publicise them.

See if any Apps support your protest:

For some free learning and information on demos/protests follow these guys and girls on Twitter:



@thirduniversity [blushes]

Make sure that you follow/use the relevant hashtags: #sukey; #n30; #solidarity; #occupylsx; #occupyleicester etc.. You will get real-time updates about the police/kettles etc..

Beware people you do not know. Police infiltration is increasing and has historical precedent. See:

4. On being kettled: keep mobile and try to avoid it, it’s a pain in the arse. Or maybe it gives us battle scars. However, advice at:

See also Fitwatch:

If you are going to protests in a group avoid coaches if you can – the police stop them/search you; agree a strategy for keeping mobile, keeping in contact, agree meeting points and consider a buddying system. You need to keep in constant communication, including with home. If things feel like they are getting tense reconsider your options.

5. On occupations

There are a number of occupations now. They all need support/educational engagements. We can all teach. We can all learn.

6. Some reading

On occupation and the University, see:

On alternative education, see also:

On the crisis see


John Holloway’s How to change the world without taking power:
Hardt and Negri’s Empire:
David Harvey’s Reading Capital Volume 1:

We also recommend Paul Mason’s blog:
Faisal Islam’s blog:
Automatic Earth:

But most of all…

Stay safe. Remember that the work of change takes protest and activity, but also lots of conversations and deliberations and education. Over, and over, and over again.

occupation, permission and freedom-as-overcoming

21 Oct

Last week we spent some time with the occupation on Wall Street. Then we wrote this. Then we read some other views about extending the occupation of LSX beyond its limits. Then we re-read about the power of the Space Project in Leeds and its hopes for a hub for radical education. Reclaiming these spaces takes courage. We have seen many acts of courage recently. We will need more as capital and those with power-to seek to re-enclose our world and re-inscribe our society with their power.

Then @willcommon wrote this on Twitter. The tweet stressed the importance of excess; of boundaries; of moving beyond limits; of disruption; of actions that are beyond permission. It reminded us of Moishe Postone’s critical re-reading of Marx, that our social constitution by labour is not transhistorical; it is historically situated and defined. It therefore underlies the automatic, and apparently normal/normalised/normalising, regulation of our social life in capitalism. This is then the object of our critique of capitalism. Emancipation, in Postone’s terms, is not found in the realisation of this mode of social constitution [of labour in capitalism] but by our overcoming of the capitalist relations of production, of value and of capital, and by our overcoming its automatic regulation of our society.

In. Against. Beyond. Inside our abstract domination. Against our abstract domination. Beyond our abstract domination. Overcoming abstract domination is a necessary presupposition for the realisation of self-determination.

Postone stresses overcoming and moving beyond limits imposed in states of normality and democracy and exception. This may be where spaces need to be theoretically-defined not in terms of their demands and their representations, but in terms of what they enable through excess. So in New York we witness Occupy Wall Street supporting moves against Stop and Frisk, which @newyorkist is tweeting about here. And in New York a march heads-off to the Village against fracking. And in New York there is a spin-off occupation of MoMA, because its sponsors are big finance and because art should be for all and not just oppressive.

And in this occupation as a space as a hub for radical education, we might ask, as @aaronjpeters did here, how do the current occupations connect to the lessons of the dispersed, demanding, student protests of last winter/spring. How do workerists, educators, students, support the variety of issues within and across our society that act as controls and constraints on our being? How do those students and workerists empower occupations to grow in excess of their spatial limits? As the Dean of St Paul’s, supported by transnational elites (the 1%) and in order to maintain capital’s reproduction of its power in our world, we might ask, in Postone’s terms, how do we use spaces as hubs of radical education, to overcome capital’s automatic regulation of our society? How do we develop the courage to reveal our freedom in acts of overcoming?

There will be some free @thirduniversity workshops happening on 5th – 6th November…

18 Oct

As part of Leicester’s community media week, the third university will be running a series of workshops during ‘open media’ day at the Phoenix Square. We will be tweeting more information about this shortly – and when we’ve got more details of other workshops on other. We’d love to see you there- again, as always, the cost of the third university is exactly nothing – so even you can afford to attend the 3rd best university in Leicester. If they prove popular, we’ll run them again.

Simple Website Building using WordPress: 1 hour

We’ll show you how you can set up a website using wordpress and turn it into a space to write, to share information or to host your campaign. We’ll go through the basis of using themes, hosting video and audio and writing your first blog post. You do not need to have much technical skills, but you do need to bring your own or share a laptop (this keeps the costs down (free!))

Social Media for Campaigns: 1 hour

This session will take a look at the recent online activist campaigns, the reasons why they went viral and explore the use of Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and ipadio are a tool for inspiring action and change. Get hands-on experience and advice on how to find, build and maintain a social media community around your cause. Bring your own laptop or mobile phone for additional opportunities to create campaigns, organise supporters and to amplify your message.

Keeping safe when making media: 1 hour

If you are making citizen media on the front line, you need to keep yourself safe. There is a chance that you’ll be more visible to the police or the rioters and with a camera/mobile to your face, there is more chance of being injured. This will be an open discussion to take about the best practice and the legal rights that you need to know if you wish to make media and document dissent.

Call for workshops:

The Third University is looking for people to host short (1hr or less) workshops or discussions on the 5th or 6th of November during Leicester’s 3rd community media week (1st-7th of November) They can be about anything, really, because we just want to learn from you and to be able to share our skills with each other. We have space – we just have to transform it. If you think you are up for a bit of skillsharing (or have a suggestion about what you might want to learn) tweet us @thirduniversity, leave a comment or drop us a line:

occupy everywhere

14 Oct

On Wednesday we went into occupation of ourselves. This was a joint action between Leicester, New York and Ayr. This is part of a general call for action and discussion about alternatives and repossession and opening out of spaces that have been violently enclosed.

In New York we took our occupation down Broadway, past City Hall and a labor rights protest against developer Sam Chang and past the portacabins at the World Trade Centre site that bore the flags of the National Union of Crane Operating Engineers and the New York City and Vicinity District Council of Carpenters. We occupied Broadway in order to witness the allegedly alternative form of organisation at Occupy Wall Street. The occupied space:

  1. made us think about how public, or previously enclosed spaces are colonised by sub-groups and permacultures, and re-enclosed by them – it made us think of homeless shelters;
  2. was clearly part of a spectacle, with the police watching the tourists watching those who faced out of the occupied space with their single issue placards who in turn corralled those who had settled the square;
  3. used consensus decision-making, and was clearly being dominated by a few people who were owning the process for others – in fact the process of repeating the words of each speaker as they spoke, formed a liturgy of consensus that risked talking down/overwhelming those who were deemed to have invalidated the process; moreover it felt like “his name is Robert Poulsen“;
  4. used consensus to decide to spend $2000 on 30 flags; the speaker proposing this wanted US-made flags that could be inscribed and used in direct action; he did not want “shitty flags” that had been made abroad; so much for labour solidarity in the face of the transnational finance capital that was located 50 yards down the street; as for ignoring capital and making rather than buying flags, well that wasn’t on the agenda;
  5. was clearly fetishised – in the face of a threatened eviction, which did not take place this morning, the occupiers cleaned the square – they became good occupiers, in order to keep the spectacle on the road. They inscribed the square with power, the same socially-reproduced power relations that they claimed to be opposing, and used consensus to re-inscribe that fact. Then it felt that the square was reified as the only focal point for action. Rather than walking away from its normalisation with the legal framework demanded by the Mayor, the occupiers cleaned their cell. You will obey the bunting. Whoever hangs it up.

And so we walked away back up Broadway and thought about occupation as an ideological apparatus that was unable to reveal a tranformatory social moment because it could not imagine a revolutionary other world. We thought about how capital needs disruptors like these in order that it can adapt to them and re-produce its logic through their actions. We thought about how a radical set of ideas around equality in a square might never become tranformatory because they cannot move away from concepts like equality as it is formed within the legalistic institutions of democracy-in-capital.

And we thought about November 9/30 in the UK, and the types of actions that might unfold from there. We thought that what is at stake is being against inequality through capital, not a fight for equality or its subsumption under equality of opportunity/social mobility. These are bourgeois sops/liberal justifications. The fight is for the negation of inequality under capital, and for alternative forms of value and ways of realising that value. And so we thought about how to use November 9/30 to engage in a critique of labour-in-capitalism as the organising principle for  the structures of our lives, and we thought how to connect students and workers in this project, in order to overcome this historical crisis. And we wondered about the role of the University, and what might be salvaged from the neoliberal university, and how that space might be re-invented against the reproduction of the university as education-for-capital.